Thursday, May 30, 2019

We Need Censorship :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

We Need Censorship     It wont kill us to make marchess, but it might if we dont. That is why it is JUSTIFIABLE to limit adults freedom of expression--it is in our, societys, best interests to protect the children. Lional Tate is just one example of a child gone bad because of the media. Tate mimicked his idol the Rock, cleanup spot a six-year onetime(a) girl by smashing her skull, pulverizing her liver, breaking her ribs and causing numerous cuts and bruises. If thats non enough of an example what about the teen from New Jersey who simply listened to Ozzy Osbornes felo-de-se Solution and killed himself? These are not random occurrences, we hear about them on the news frequently. If our freedom of expression is harming kids why cant we fix the problem by not allowing them access to it?   Argument one, People, especially children are very susceptible to being influenced by what they watch or see happen throughout their lives.   pixie see, Monkey do. Everyone has heard this phrase sometime in his or her life. This phrase is simple, yet very applicable to todays debate. When a child sees someone or something doing something. They will of trail follow suit and imitate the action being performed. Children do not know any better. Therefore they are innocent and deserve to be respected. It is for these by-line reasons that we argue for the censorship of harmful materials that could influence a child or children into violent acts, expressions, and other dangerous actions. Through television, video games, and movies, children and teens view countless acts of violence, brutality, and little terror as part of entertainment. They become conditioned to associating violence with entertainment. First-person shooter video games develop our childrens skills in operating weapons. The games reward marksmanship, and further reinforce the association of killing with entertainment. In the past, the heroes of movie and television sh ows were usually people who strictly followed the law. Now, heroes are often people who take the law into their own hands, who see an injustice or evil and seek to rectify it personally, sometimes brutally, regardless of the consequences. Such portrayals signal, to a child, societys approval of that behavior.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.